a:2:{i:0;a:1:{s:4:"data";a:1:{s:7:"entries";a:1:{i:0;a:7:{s:2:"id";s:3:"183";s:5:"title";s:35:"Still Publishing Summary RSS Feeds?";s:11:"displayDate";s:10:"10.15.2008";s:13:"attributeDate";s:10:"2008-10-15";s:4:"body";s:904:"

While there is no “correct” choice in the full vs. summary RSS feed debate, I came across a situation this weekend that reinforced my opinion for full feeds.

The past few days, I was at An Event Apart Chicago, and I only had access internet access on Monday and Tuesday during the day. Now, I wanted to read my RSS feeds at other times, so I took my Google Reader offline with Gears, and started to read through them.

This worked great until I got to feeds that only gave a summary. How was I supposed to read the article? Stop begging for page views and give me the content.

I guess it’s just one more thing to consider when trying to decide whether to choose full vs. summary. Have your own opinion? Vote below.

Which do you prefer?

[polldaddy poll=1001137]";s:13:"numberOfLikes";N;s:10:"bodyBlocks";a:0:{}}}}}i:1;O:25:"yii\caching\TagDependency":3:{s:4:"tags";a:4:{i:0;s:7:"element";i:1;s:29:"element::craft\elements\Entry";i:2;s:40:"element::craft\elements\Entry::section:4";i:3;s:7:"graphql";}s:4:"data";a:4:{s:40:"CraftCMSce35088bdfe0816226cd17fd051a4803";s:21:"0.46162700 1707493692";s:40:"CraftCMS2743a789e8993267a348eee1ee7e4450";s:21:"0.34758900 1706282441";s:40:"CraftCMS2ac34726f299f7e18e449d8e536c67f8";s:21:"0.22771600 1711953912";s:40:"CraftCMS3817d4a648fcfac939af46605323feb0";s:21:"0.44505500 1681499442";}s:8:"reusable";b:0;}}