a:2:{i:0;a:1:{s:4:"data";a:1:{s:7:"entries";a:1:{i:0;a:7:{s:2:"id";s:3:"261";s:5:"title";s:23:"Weekly Link Round-Up #7";s:11:"displayDate";s:10:"11.23.2007";s:13:"attributeDate";s:10:"2007-11-23";s:4:"body";s:2696:"
After a nice short week, and 2 days of eating and football, time to share my links for the week. This collection is only until Wednesday, but I still found a bunch of interesting things.
I need to go back and watch this movie again after seeing all the great typography that is used. Someone definitely put a lot of time and effort into choosing the typography for the movie.
Ready, set, GO! I got 51. How many did you get? I got basically all of the non-depreciated elements, except for a few. The ones I missed were like noscript
, frame
and things like that.
I got 67. There were some that I was smacking myself for not getting, but then there are a bunch that aren’t really supported.
Can Apple do anything wrong right now? This ad is genius.
A lot of this stuff is things most people probably know, but there is a lot of interesting stuff here.
Take this quick 10 question survey from a class at the Art Institute of Atlanta. The results are about what I figured, except for 1 or 2.
Yeah, I think “Advanced Search” is not a good term. I like what Roger suggests: “Refined” and “Enhanced”.
The Godfather speaks. A great article from Jeffrey Zeldman about how you can’t really design for the web if you don’t understand it.
This was a great issue of A List Apart this week. This article shows different tests of sizing typography. I think the important thing in this article is that Richard is testing to see his vertical grid grow when users resize their text.